- Houghton, M., Patti, E., & Phipps, D. (2021, April 8). Investigation of the relationship between lower-body power and acceleration in DI female soccer players [Paper presentation]. Student Scholars Symposium, Nashville, TN. Abstract
The aim of the study is to compare the power and velocity of the concentric phase of a weighted squat with acceleration in a 20 yard sprint (10 and 20-yd splits) to determine if a positive correlation exists between high power/velocity and faster split times. Female collegiate soccer players (n = 20) performed two sets of 3 explosive squats and one 20-yard sprint. The participants were instructed to perform the eccentric squat phase at a normal pace until the quadriceps were parallel to the floor and then to perform the concentric phase as quickly and explosively as possible. The participants performed two sets of 3 reps of these squats at 30% 1RM with 90 seconds of rest between sets. Using GymAware, peak/mean power and peak/mean velocity were collected for each rep. From the data, averages were calculated per variable. Each participant then sprinted 20 yards on grass, using mounted FitLights to collect times per 10-yard split. Pearson correlations will be used to compare various combinations of peak/mean power, peak/mean velocity, and 10/20-yard split times. Results, analysis, and conclusions are pending.
- Kroeger, M., Aziz, M., & Hazen, P. (2021, April 8). The effects of different types of face-masks on physiological parameters during acute exercise sessions [Paper presentation]. Student Scholars Symposium, Nashville, TN. Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of type of facemask (surgical vs. cloth vs. no mask) on the physiological parameters, more specifically RPE, HR, and oxygen saturation, of college-aged students during acute exercise bouts. Methods: 12 subjects were recruited for the study. Each subject performed three 5-minute trials on the treadmill. For each trial, subjects wore a standardized mask out of 3 groups: no mask, surgical mask, and cloth mask in differing orders. Each subject had their RHR taken and walked at a 5% grade, 5 minutes at speed 3.5 MPH (speed adjusted if HR < 110). After each trial, HR, RPE, oxygen saturation recorded. Each subject rested for 15 minutes before their next trial. Subjects then repeated the protocol they completed during their first trial. Physiological data was recorded for the second and third trials for each different face mask type. Results: Repeated Measures ANOVA HR: F = .8689; p=.4333 Oxygen Saturation: F= .4162; p= 0.6646 RPE: F= 4.5108; p = 0.0228 (p<0.05) Post hoc test: - PM (paper) vs. NM (no mask) = p < 0.05 significant difference Conclusion: There was a significant difference in RPE values between surgical/paper mask vs. no mask (p<0.05, PM yielded higher RPE). However, there was no significant difference between other mask condition RPEs and no significant difference between recorded heart rates and oxygen saturations between mask conditions (p>.05). We concluded from our study that the type of face mask one wears does not affect heart rate or oxygen saturation during aerobic exercise. We concluded that it is possible that exercise participants may feel a higher rate of perceived exertion when wearing a surgical mask. But, despite the increased perception of effort, it is completely safe to exercise in either type of facemask in the COVID-19 era.
- Long, M., Lowery, N., & Gibson, S. (2021, April 8). Efficacy of preseason training on fitness levels of high school male soccer players [Paper presentation]. Student Scholars Symposium, Nashville, TN. Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of preseason training on fitness level at the beginning of the season for high school male soccer players. Methods: 10 male soccer players from a private high school soccer team were selected to participate in a beep test, a 1-minute push up test, a 1-minute sit up test, and a 1-mile timed run on two separate occasions, the first being before their preseason training had begun, and the second being after their preseason training had concluded. Height, weight, and age were measured prior to testing on both occasions. The push up test and sit up test were selected because they measure muscular strength and endurance in the upper body and core. The beep test and 1-mile run tests were selected because they measure aerobic endurance. Results were tested for significance with a paired sample t-test at an alpha level of .05. Results: The average stage reached in the second beep test was significantly higher than the first test. For the 1-mile run, the average was significantly lower during the second test. There was no significant difference between the first sit up and push up test scores and the second set of scores. The predicted averages VO2max was significantly higher during the second test than the first. Conclusion: Overall, there was a significant improvement in anaerobic and anerobic capacities and the preseason training was effective. Muscular endurance was not significantly different and there was not an effect of the training protocols.
- Thomas, J., Camp, D., & Eddings, A. (2021, April 8). The effect of pre-workout supplementation on heart rate, performance, and RPE during high intensity interval exercise [Paper presentation]. Student Scholars Symposium, Nashville, TN. Abstract
Background: The goal of this study is to see what, if any, the physiological or psychological effects of effects of either a pre-workout supplement or a placebo on physically fit college-aged students. Methods: A total of six college aged students five boys and three girls, completed a 10 minute HITT workout. Biometric data (weight and BIA) as well as blood pressure were measured prior to the first workout. Heart rate, repetition count, and RPE were measured throughout the workout. Subject completed two trials: one with the pre workout intervention and one with a placebo; order of trials was counterbalanced. Thirty minutes prior to the workout, the subjects drank either placebo or pre workout in a single-blind study design, thirty minutes, they did a five minute warm up (either walking on a treadmill or on a stationary bike) followed by static stretching. Then, the subjects completed the 10 minute HITT workout consisting of 45 seconds of work and 15 seconds of rest. The workout included exercises such as burpees, jump squats, mountain climbers, and squat pulses. In the 15 seconds of rest, the researchers recorded the heart rate of the subjects and repetition count of each exercise just completed. Rate of perceived exertion was recorded after the fifth and tenth exercises. After the workout was over, the subjects cooled down with stretching for 5 minutes. Results: There was a significant difference in the heart rate average of the second half of the HITT workout (p<.05). However, there was not a significant difference in the other areas that we looked at in our study including: heart rate average (first half), average RPE, and average repetition count (p>.05). Conclusion: We failed to reject the null hypothesis. We conclude that pre-workout does not significantly improve rate of perceived exertion, performance, or the heart rate (during the first half of the workout) (p> 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in the heart rate during the second section of the workout (p<0.05). Adding pre-workout does not necessarily hurt or hinder one’s workout.